This blog is a random collection of information, partly in support of my quotations web site. Other topics include wine, military news, economics, history, libertarianism, and other random things which happen to strike my fancy. Backup site is at http://quotulatiousness.blogspot.com/ (if there are no posts showing, hit the backup blog for explanation). Comments have been turned off, as the spam was getting too much to handle. Comments can be emailed to me for posting.

April 13, 2005

Ralph Peters shoots down the USAF

Today's New York Post has a column by Ralph Peters which will make it unsafe for him to fly anywhere within range of a USAF intercept base:

I had written columns critical of the platinum-plated F/A-22, the most expensive fighter in history and an aircraft without a mission. So the Air Force decided to lobby me.

Those two generals spun the numbers until the stone-cold truth was buried under a mantra of "air dominance," imaginary combat roles and financial slight-of-hand. Still, I wanted to be fair. I took them seriously and investigated their claims.

Not one thing they said held up under scrutiny.

Morally bankrupt, the Air Force is willing to turn a blind eye to the pressing needs of soldiers and Marines at war in order to get more of its $300-million-apiece junk fighters. With newer, far more costly aircraft than the Marines possess, the Air Force pleads that it just can't defend our country without devouring the nation's defense budget.

To cap off the initial hit, he also goes on to say "The Air Force hasn't forgotten how to fight. But it only wants to fight the other services."

I know that inter-service rivalry has a long and painful tradition in most national histories, but this is one of the most bitter diatribes I think I've ever read in a public forum. Is it really this bad between the flyboys and the ground pounders?

Posted by Nicholas at April 13, 2005 11:22 AM
Comments
Yep. The AF's continuing attempts to get rid of the Warthog has the pongos out for blood. Posted by: buckahed at April 13, 2005 05:22 PM
Surely the Warthog/Thunderbolt II question is both long-standing and of barely historical interest by now. If Mr. Peters' story is to be given credit, the USAF has passed from merely attempting to bureaucratically out-manouvre the Navy and Army to being actively antagonistic. That's a bit more dangerous than trying to eliminate a single weapons platform, yes? Posted by: Nicholas at April 14, 2005 12:04 AM


Visitors since 17 August, 2004