This blog is a random collection of information, partly in support of my quotations web site. Other topics include wine, military news, economics, history, libertarianism, and other random things which happen to strike my fancy. Backup site is at http://quotulatiousness.blogspot.com/ (if there are no posts showing, hit the backup blog for explanation). Comments have been turned off, as the spam was getting too much to handle. Comments can be emailed to me for posting.

July 27, 2006

QotD: Music

All first-rate music suffers by the fact that it has to be performed by human beings — that is, that nature must be permitted to corrupt it. The performance one hears in a concert hall or opera house is no more than a baroque parody upon the thing the composer imagined. In an orchestra of eighty men there is inevitably at least one man with a sore thumb, or bad kidneys, or a brutal wife or katzenjammer — and one is enough. Some day the natural clumsiness and imperfection of fingers, lips and larynxes will be overcome by mechanical devices, and we shall have Beethoven and Mozart and Schubert in such wonderful and perfect beauty that it will be almost unbearable. If half as much ingenuity had been lavished upon music machines as has been lavished upon the telephone and the steam engine, we whould have had mechanical orchestras long ago.

When the human performer of music thus goes the way of the galley-slave, the charm of personality, of course, will be pumped out of the performance of music. But the charm of personality does not help music; it hinders it. It is not a reënforcement; it is a rival. When a beautiful singer comes upon a stage, two shows, as it were, go on at once; first the music show, and then the arms, shoulders, neck, nose, ankles, eyes, hips, calves, and ruby lips — in brief, the sex-show. The second of these shows, to the majority of persons present, is more interesting than the first — to the men because of the sex interest, and to the women because of the professional or technical interest — and so music is forced into the background. What it becomes, indeed, is no more than a half-heard accompaniment to an imagined anecdote.

H.L. Mencken, "The Tone Art", Damn! A Book of Calumny, 1918

Posted by Nicholas at July 27, 2006 08:29 AM
Comments
Mencken can speak for himself... maybe he's a horndog that evaluates the soloist's beauty first and foremost. I can certainly appreciate good tone and pitch even if it is wrapped in a package that fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. Itzhak Perlman has a terrific amount of musical talent -- he plays a peerless violin, a mean piano, and he can sing -- the fact that the man had polio and walks onstage with crutches does not impede my enjoyment one tiny iota. I doubt there is a more able-bodied fella that can play better, in fact. Posted by: Chris Taylor at July 27, 2006 12:24 PM
Mencken can speak for himself... maybe he's a horndog that evaluates the soloist's beauty first and foremost.
Perlman's lack of physical pulchritude may help you to concentrate on his music . . . because you have fewer distractions to the, um, baser elements of your psyche (I'm using "you" generically here, of course). Even the celebrated, cerebral Flea has admitted that physical charms can distract him from the pure artistic appreciation of a performance (ref: http://www.ghostofaflea.com/archives/008382.html). I can make no such claims of artistic purity for myself . . . I'm too easily distracted by the visual to pay proper attention to the aural. If that makes me a "horndog", well, so be it. ;-) Posted by: Nicholas at July 27, 2006 05:44 PM
I suppose I consider Mencken's statement to be fundamentally correct but with an inherent sunshine clause. After enough "nice wrapping but poor content" errors you are bound to wise up. When I was a younger fella I thought Ofra Harnoy was God's gift to the cello. But after listening to her album, it was clear that she was an inferior cellist next to a guy like Yo-Yo Ma. Today's classical equivalent would be that all-girl group bond. Sure they look nice, and they have some talent, but all of their work sounds like those awful 70s mash-ups of classical tunes reinterpreted with a disco vibe. In much less rarified terms I am sure the same thing drove young men to buy Debbie Gibson or Alanis albums (back when she had big 80s hair). And yeah I was one of those guys back then. So yes you can get distracted (infatuated, if you will) for a while -- but if you've heard better, sooner or later your brain will resuscitate and start injecting reason into the evaluation. Posted by: Chris Taylor at July 28, 2006 11:54 AM


Visitors since 17 August, 2004