This blog is a random collection of information, partly in support of my quotations web site. Other topics include wine, military news, economics, history, libertarianism, and other random things which happen to strike my fancy. Backup site is at http://quotulatiousness.blogspot.com/ (if there are no posts showing, hit the backup blog for explanation). Comments have been turned off, as the spam was getting too much to handle. Comments can be emailed to me for posting.

May 14, 2007

Over-the-top iconography

Last week, Whitby made the news when a local parent strenuously objected to the Boy Scout badge her son brought home. The Toronto Star had somewhat predictable coverage:

Cale Northey went to a Scouts Canada camp to learn about gun safety. He came back with a "licence to kill."

That's how his parents view the badge the 11-year-old brought home from a target shooting event in Oshawa last weekend.

The badge features an Agent 007-type figure pointing a gun with a red target over his heart.

"I think it's terrible," said Cale's mother, Jane Northey. "We've got kids shooting up everyone these days. What kind of message are we sending them? This badge is a licence to kill sponsored by Scouts Canada."

I thought the whole thing was overwrought, and just another excuse for the Star to run a glib anti-gun article. Until I got a look at the actual badge, and I discovered that Jane Northey had a case:

ScoutShootingBadge_12May07.jpg

Could you have designed a badge that was more likely to get up the noses of people who aren't comfortable with guns? This is the intellectual equivalent of a drive-by mooning.

What. Were. They. Thinking?

What part of "responsible gun handling" does this illustrate?

Posted by Nicholas at May 14, 2007 11:45 AM
Comments
Yes, that is a little wince-producing. With an artfully concealed mental chuckle, too. On has to remember that outsiders don't always get the humor of something, especially people who are prone to leaving their one giant nerve exposed on their sleeve. No point in punching them on the arm just because you can. Posted by: John of Argghhh! at May 14, 2007 02:55 PM
What part of "responsible gun handling" does this illustrate?
I totally agree. Those crosshairs really should be more towards the target's centre of mass. Posted by: Jon at May 16, 2007 11:13 AM


Visitors since 17 August, 2004