Chris Mellor relives those oh-so-not-glorious days of backing up your computer:
Ever tried backing up your PC to Travan tape? I made that mistake and it was a great introduction to the concept of geological time; the bloody thing stopped and started like a kangaroo tied to the spot with a bungee cord. It took so long to back up files that I went bald waiting.
The backup software was a dog and perfectly matched the awful Travan hardware. I tried restoring a file because I thought it a good idea to practise, but it would have been less painful burning my ear with a blowtorch. Finding the file in the backup software's catalogue, mounting the tape and then paring down my nails, my fingers, my thumbs, my hands and most of my arms while the backup software found the file on the tape and then restored it was an exercise in self-inflicted torture.
Just when you thought the glacial backup flow had completed, the software would proudly announce a verification run to make sure that the data really was backed up, and the Friday evening dinner date had better be put back another two hours while it laboriously and tediously examined every dratted bit of data on the tape that went through the drive as fast as a nervous nanny driving a Nissan Micra with newborn puppies on the front seat.
Of course, things aren't as bad nowadays, but we're still waiting for the ideal solution . . . I'd bet that half the folks reading this have no idea how recently they've backed up their data or (if they have) whether the backup is viable.
I'd had more than my fair share of tedious backup experiences (starting back in the dark ages, when I'd have to set aside an entire day — and a large stack of floppy discs — to run a backup). CD backup was certainly better, but it still was a largely manual operation and you had to babysit the process. DVD backup was another improvement, but you needed to be there during the task.
I tried using an external drive. That didn't go so well. It started nicely, but then faded badly. A replacement drive wasn't the solution, so I'm now backing up to a secondary internal drive, and still going through the DVD shuffle to make offline backups. There's got to be a better way.
Posted by Nicholas at January 19, 2009 10:22 AMJust one piece of advice (which you have probably heard already).
You can get the speed of an internal drive with the convenience (and swap-ability) of an external drive, by using an external drive housing with eSATA (rather than USB or firewire) capability. eSATA whomps the hell out of USB throughput speed and all but the very fastest Firewire S3200. Of course having eSATA depends on your motherboard having a spare SATA port, a cable to connect the spare SATA mobo port with a peripheral bracket, and an external drive enclosure with eSATA cable. I was lucky, my SATA-capable external drive enclosure came with all the junk I needed.
I use a 1 TB drive with an external, extremely quiet fan-cooled housing to conduct nightly backups. 1 TB handles about 5 days worth of backups (movie/music files, photos, household and personal docs, SQL DBs, and a few precious game saves). If I were a real nerd I'd get a couple 1TB drives and swap them out weekly to maintain a whole month's worth of backups, but so far I have never needed any deleted item beyond the 5-day window. For large drives and backups, I wouldn't use anything other than a fan cooled solution; just make sure you get a quiet one.
Posted by: Chris Taylor at January 19, 2009 12:06 PMI have an older motherboard, so adding a super-kewl new interface would have been a bit more expensive than the individual options I tried. (Not, of course, if I'd just done that the first time. ;-)
Posted by: Nicholas at January 19, 2009 12:08 PM
Visitors since 17 August, 2004